ICM · Research & Decision Studio · transformation-map · Model 1.1.1 · Illustrative inputs
Capability architecture
Transformation map
Make prerequisite bundles, constrained capacity and benefit assumptions explicit.
Transformation / capabilityIllustrative composition
The interactive model requires JavaScript. This saved default illustration remains readable if the runtime is unavailable. Values are computed from the canonical model at build time; they describe fictional inputs, with full calculation precision.
ICM · Transformation map · Model 1.1.1 · Default illustrative record
Default illustrative result
4 capabilities fit the supplied budget and delivery capacity in prerequisite order. The architecture and audit trail retain every selected identifier and prerequisite. Planned investment is 435 USDk, with 36 person-months of effort. Adjusted annual benefit is 253.76 USDk/year. 65 USDk and 12 person-months remain.
| Metric | Value | Unit | Calculation boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capabilities in feasible sequence | 4 | ||
| Planned investment | 435 | USDk | |
| Adjusted annual benefit | 253.7625 | USDk/year | Benefit × confidence × readiness, additive. |
| Delivery effort | 36 | person-months |
| ID | Capability | Prerequisites | InvestmentUSDk | Stated annual benefitUSDk/year | Adjusted benefitUSDk/year | Effortperson-months | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DATA | Shared data foundation | 140 | 35 | 25.2 | 12 | Selected in prerequisite order | |
| CRM | Commercial intelligence | DATA | 130 | 160 | 108.8 | 10 | Selected in prerequisite order |
| OWN | Operating ownership | 55 | 25 | 22.5625 | 6 | Selected in prerequisite order | |
| AUTO | Workflow automation | OWN | 110 | 120 | 97.2 | 8 | Selected in prerequisite order |
| OPS | Predictive operations | DATA, OWN | 190 | 260 | 127.4 | 18 | Bundle exceeds remaining budget |
| Target | Capability | Full prerequisite bundle | Bundle investmentUSDk | Bundle effortperson-months | Adjusted annual benefitUSDk/year | Benefit / investmentper year | Initially fits both constraints |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTO | Workflow automation | OWN, AUTO | 165 | 14 | 119.7625 | 0.7258333333333333 | Yes |
| CRM | Commercial intelligence | DATA, CRM | 270 | 22 | 134 | 0.4962962962962963 | Yes |
| OPS | Predictive operations | DATA, OWN, OPS | 385 | 36 | 175.16250000000002 | 0.4549675324675325 | Yes |
| OWN | Operating ownership | OWN | 55 | 6 | 22.5625 | 0.4102272727272727 | Yes |
| DATA | Shared data foundation | DATA | 140 | 12 | 25.2 | 0.18 | Yes |
| Step | Target | Added bundle | Incremental costUSDk | Incremental effortperson-months | Incremental annual benefitUSDk/year | Marginal benefit / costper year | Budget leftUSDk | Capacity leftperson-months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AUTO | OWN → AUTO | 165 | 14 | 119.7625 | 0.7258333333333333 | 335 | 34 |
| 2 | CRM | DATA → CRM | 270 | 22 | 134 | 0.4962962962962963 | 65 | 12 |
Inputs behind this result
| Assumption and unit | Exact supplied value |
|---|---|
| Available investment (USDk) | 500 |
| Delivery capacity (person-months) | 48 |
| Capability ID | Capability | InvestmentUSDk | Annual benefitUSDk/year | Benefit confidence% | Operating readiness% | Effortperson-months | Prerequisite IDs, comma separated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DATA | Shared data foundation | 140 | 35 | 90 | 80 | 12 | |
| OWN | Operating ownership | 55 | 25 | 95 | 95 | 6 | |
| OPS | Predictive operations | 190 | 260 | 70 | 70 | 18 | DATA, OWN |
| CRM | Commercial intelligence | 130 | 160 | 80 | 85 | 10 | DATA |
| AUTO | Workflow automation | 110 | 120 | 90 | 90 | 8 | OWN |
Transparent method
- Adjusted annual benefit = stated annual benefit × confidence × readiness. These are explicit judgement multipliers, not measured probabilities.
- For each candidate, compute the unselected prerequisite closure, cost, effort and adjusted annual benefit.
- Choose the affordable closure with highest marginal annual benefit / investment cost; ties resolve by ID. Repeat with the remaining budget and effort.
- Selected sequence follows dependencies. Zero-cost positive-benefit bundles take precedence, subject to effort.
- Budget and effort admission compare exact sums of the canonical decimal input numbers, without an absolute feasibility allowance. JSON resourceEvaluation retains the exact decimal capacity, used and remaining accounts.
- Tied bundle ratios use literal identifier order independent of browser language for consistent selection; this remains the declared heuristic rather than proof of an optimum.
Limits
- A deterministic greedy heuristic, not a global optimum, NPV or recommendation to invest.
- Additive annual benefits assume no overlap, synergies or benefit decay. Readiness and confidence can double count risk if defined inconsistently.
- No owners, calendars, resource roles or actual enterprise data are inferred.
- Numerical input precision: use zero or absolute values of at least 0.000000001. Smaller nonzero inputs are rejected explicitly.
- Annual benefits and density rankings are Number approximations. Resource sums retain canonical decimal precision after JSON parsing; digits already lost in parsing cannot be recovered. The exact resource account does not establish a globally optimal portfolio.